BAR - Brazilian Administration Review
BAR is a scholarly journal on business and public administration published quarterly since 2004 by ANPAD (Brazilian Academy of Management). BAR is a fully open-access online journal that is a member and abides by the principles of COPE – Committee on Publication Ethics for scholarly publication. BAR is available in most indexing services, including Scopus, Scielo and Web of Science
BAR’s mission is to advance scholarly knowledge on management and organizational theories so as to assist business and public administration worldwide by means of the global dissemination of conceptual and empirical studies developed in Brazil and other countries.
The journal publishes conceptual and empirical studies within the broad interests of business and public administration. Theoretical and methodological perspectives are welcome as long as they are insightful also for practice. BAR documents should not focus on a particular country/region and must convey theoretical, methodological, and applied advancements to the frontiers of scholarly knowledge on a global scale. BAR’s editorial scope does not include teaching cases or purely applied practitioner-oriented material.
BAR's target audience is the global scholarly community in all interests of business and public administration.
Indicators (1st Quarter of 2026)
Average time for the first round of peer review: 100 days (between the initial submission and the decision of the first round of peer review)
Average time for the complete peer review process: 203 days (from the initial submission, through the full peer review process, to a final decision of acceptance or rejection)
Average time from submission to publication: 246 days (between the submission of the article and its publication in an issue)
Submission acceptance rate: 17%
Current Issue
Vol. 23 No. 3 (2026): Jul/Sep - 2026
Published: 2026-06-23
Interview
The Return of Meaning and Values: A Conversation with Roy Suddaby on Institutional Theory, History, and Change
This interview presents Professor Roy Suddaby’s reflections on history, values, and the future of institutional theory. He discusses the evolution of institutional work, the use of historical analysis, and the renewed attention to meaning and values in the study of institutions. The conversation addresses the challenges of theoretical dominance, the emergence of new ideas, and the role of collective memory in understanding institutional continuity and change.
Read more →