Social innovation, experimentalism, and public governance: An ethnographical approach to study public arenas in the city
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study offers a new perspective on the relationship between social innovation and public governance. It drew inspiration from pragmatism, emphasizing the importance of public inquiry and democratic experimentalism. The perspective was applied and validated through a series of studies conducted within the framework of the Observatory of Social Innovation in Florianópolis, Brazil, since 2017. The study presented and
discussed the findings and insights gained from observing the emergence and spread (or lack thereof) of social innovations in the city’s public arenas. It revisited the debate on public governance to establish a framework for the study of public action. It then identified gaps and improvements in the literature linking public governance and social innovation. Based on these previous discussions, the article proposes an approach to pragmatist ethnography of public arenas validated by empirical studies in Florianópolis. The results provide insights into how societal-state relations and modes of governance can facilitate or impede social innovation and the promotion of more democratic and sustainable cities. The study contributes to a better understanding of the interplay between social innovation and public governance, and its implications for the development of more inclusive and sustainable cities.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Andion, C. (2023). Social innovation, experimentalism, and public governance: An ethnographical approach to study public arenas in the city. Brazilian Administration Review, 20(2), e220124. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2023220124
Section
Research Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Andion, C., Ronconi, L., Moraes, R. L., Gonsalves, A. K. R., & Serafim, L. B. D. (2017). Civil society and social innovation in the public sphere: A pragmatic perspective. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 51(3), 369-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612143195
Andion, C., Moraes, R. L., & Gonsalves, A. K. R. (2017). Civil society organizations and social innovation: How and to what extent are they influencing social and political change? CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, (90), 5-34. https://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.90.8808
Andion, C., Alperstedt, G. D., & Graeff, J. F. (2019). Social innovation ecosystems and cities: Co-construction of a collaborative platform. In J. Howaldt, C. Kaletka, A. Schröeder, & M. Zirngiebl (Eds.), Atlas of Social Innovation (2nd volume: A world of new practices). European School of Social Innovation.
Andion, C., Alperstedt, G. D., & Graeff, J. F. (2020). Social innovation ecosystems, sustainability, and democratic experimentation: A study in Florianopolis, Brazil. Revista de Administração Pública, 54(1), 181-200. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220180418x
Andion, C., Alperstedt, G., Graeff, J., & Ronconi, L. (2022). Social innovation ecosystems and sustainability in cities: A study in Florianópolis, Brazil. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 1259-1281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01496-9
Anglada S. E. (2016). Social innovation and local systems of governance: A comparison of political participation by networks for the promotion of a solidarity-based economy in Barcelona and Bilbao. Papers, 101(1), 31-49. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.1796
Ansell, C. (2011). Pragmatist democracy: Evolutionary learning as public philosophy. Oxford Scholarship.
Ansell, C. (2012). What is democratic experiment? Contemporary Pragmatism, 9(2), 159-180. https://doi.org/10.1163/18758185-90000235
Ansell, C., & Boin, A. (2019). Taming deep uncertainty: The potential of pragmatist principles for understanding and improving strategic crisis management. Administration & Society, 51(7), 1079-1112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399717747655
Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems. Public Management Review, 23(7), 949-960. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1820272
Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2016). Handbook on theories of governance. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Arampatzi, A. (2022). Social Innovation and austerity governance in Athens and Madrid: Rethinking the changing contours of policy and practice. European Urban and Regional Studies, 29(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764211028900
Arko-Cobbah, A. (2008). The right of access to information: Opportunities and challenges for civil society and good governance in South Africa. IFLA Journal, 34(2), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035208092154
Baker, S., & Mehmood, A. (2015). Social innovation and governance of sustainable places. Local Environment, 20(3), 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.842964
Barandiaran, X. (2021). Gobernanza Colaborativa para la innovación pública y social: El caso de Gipuzkoa, País Vasco. European Public and Social Innovation Review, 6(2), 78-96. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.21-2.6
Bartels, K. (2020). Transforming the relational dynamics of urban governance: How social innovation research can create a trajectory for learning and change. Urban Studies, 57(14), 2868-2884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019889290
Bevilacqua, C., Ou, Y., Pizzimenti, P., & Minervino, G. (2020). New Public institutional forms and social innovation in urban governance: Insights from the “Mayor’s Office of New Urban Mechanics” (MONUM) in Boston. Sustainability, 12(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010023
Bifulco, L. (2020). Sharing and control: The Janus-faced governance of social services at times of social innovation and social investment. Social Work and Society, 18(1), 1-11. https://ejournals.bib.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/sws/article/view/635
Biljohn, M. I. M., & Lues, L. (2020). Citizen participation, social innovation, and the governance of local government service delivery: Findings from South Africa. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(3), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1628052
Bode, I., & Brandsen, T. (2014). State-Third Sector partnerships: A short overview of key issues in the debate. Public Management Review, 16(8), 1055-1066. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.957344
Bragaglia, F. (2021). Social Innovation as a ‘magic concept’ for policy makers and its implications for urban governance. Planning Theory, 20(2), 102-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095220934832
Burlandy, L. (2011). A atuação da sociedade civil na construção do campo da Alimentação e Nutrição no Brasil: Elementos para reflexão. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 6(1), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011000100010
Calvo, P. M. H., & Fernandez, J. G. (2021). Iniciativas de diálogo, participación e innovación social para mejorar la gobernanza territorial en el medio rural. Ciudades, (24), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.24197/ciudades.24.2021.45-64
Campomori, F., & Casula, M. (2022). How to frame the governance dimension of social Innovation: Theorectical considerations and empirical evidence. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2022.2036952
Castells, M. (2018). Ruptura: A crise da democracia liberal. Zahar.
Castro-Arce, K., Parra, C., & Vanclay, F. (2019). Social Innovation, sustainability and the governance of protected areas: Revealing theory as it plays out in practice in Costa Rica. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(13), 2255-2272. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1537976
Cefaï, D. (2002). Qu’est-ce qu’une arène publique? Quelques pistes pour une approche pragmatiste. In D. Cefaï, & I. Joseph (Orgs.), L’héritage du pragmatism: Conflits d’urbanité et épreuves de civisme (pp. 51-82). Éditions de l'Aube.
Cefaï, D. (2007). Pourquoi se mobilise-t-on? Les théories de l’action collective. La Découverte.
Cefaï, D. (2017). Públicos, problemas públicos, arenas públicas... O que nos ensina o pragmatismo (Parte 1). Novos Estudos CEBRAP, 36(1), 187-213. https://doi.org/10.25091/S0101-3300201700010009
Cefaï, D., & Terzi, C. (2012). L´expérience des problèmes publiques. Éditions de l’EHESS.
Certomà, C. (2022). Future scenarios of digital social innovation in urban governance. A collective discussion on the socio-political implications in Ghent. Cities, 122. 103542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103542
Chateauraynaud, F. (2011). Argumenter dans un champ de forces: Essai de balistique sociologique. Éditions Petra.
Chateauraynaud, F., & Debaz, J. (2017). Aux Bords de l’irreversible: Sociologie pragmatique des transformations. Éditions Petra.
Chateauraynaud, F. (2021). Des expérimentations démocratiques en tension. L’oeuvre des citoyens dans le travail politique des bifurcations. Cahiers du GRM, 18. https://doi.org/10.4000/grm.3238
Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1992). Civil Society and Political Theory. MIT Press.
Constantini, E., Piriu, A. A., & Addabbo, T. (2022). Understanding the nexus between local governance and social innovation: Evidence from an Italian study on family policies, with an ex-post COVID-19 interference. Polis, 37(1), 71-104. https://rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1424/103559
Corrêa, D. (2019). A sociologia pragmática em três gestos. In R. Cantu, S. Leal, D. S. Corrêa, & L. Chartain., Sociologia, crítica e pragmatismo: Diálogos entre França e Brasil (pp. 265-302). Pontes Editores.
De Muro, P., Hamdouch, A., Cameron, S., & Moulaert, F. et al. (2007). Organisations de la société civile, innovation sociale et gouvernance de la lutte contre la pauvreté dans le Tiers-Monde. Mondes en Développement, 3(139), 25–42
Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. Swallow Press.
Dewey, J. (1950). Logica, teoria de la investigación. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Dewey, J. (1974). Experiência e natureza (Murilo Otávio Rodrigues Paes Leme, Trans.). Abril Cultural.
Dias, M. E. (2019). Arena Pública de Resíduos Sólidos Urbanos: Um estudo no Ecossistema de Inovação Social de Florianópolis [Master’s thesis]. Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Eizaguirre, S., Pradel, M., Terrones, A., Martinez-Celorrio, X., & García, M. (2012). Multilevel governance and social cohesion: Bringing back conflict in citizenship practices. Urban Studies, 49(9), 1999-2016. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26150973
Follet, M. P. (2013). Creative Experience. Martino Fine Books. (Original work published 1951).
Frega, R. (2019). Pragmatism and the wide view of democracy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Galego, D., Moulaert, F., Brans, M., & Santinha, G. (2022). Social innovation & governance: A scoping review. The European Journal of Social Science Research, 35(2), 265-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2021.1879630
Follet, M. P. (2016). The New State. Connecticut. Martino Fine Books. (Original work published 1923).
Gaudin, J.-P. (2002). Pourquoi la gouvernance. Presses de Sciences Po.
Georgios, C., & Barraí, H. (2023). Social Innovation in rural governance: A comparative case study across the marginalised rural EU. Journal of Rural Studies, 99, 193-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.06.004
Gerometta, J., Hausermann, H. H., & Longo, G. (2005). Social Innovation and civil society in urban governance: Strategies for an inclusive city. Urban Studies, 42(11), 2007-2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279851
Gonsalves, A. K. R., & Andion, C. (2019). Ação pública e inovação social: Uma análise do Sistema de Garantia de Direitos da Criança e do Adolescente de Florianópolis-SC. Organizações e Sociedade, 26(89), 221-248. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-9260892
Gurza Lavalle, A., & Szwako, J. (2015). Sociedade civil, Estado e autonomia: Argumentos, contra-argumentos e avanços no debate. Opinião Pública, 21(1), 157-187. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-0191211157
Howaldt, J., Kaletka, C., Schröder, A., & Zirngiebl, M. (2018). Atlas of Social Innovation – New practices for a better future. TU Dortmund University.
Howaldt, J., Kaletka, C., Schröder, A., & Zirngiebl, M. (Eds.). (2019). Atlas of Social Innovation – A world of new practices (2nd vol). European School of Social Innovation.
Ishkanian, A. (2014). Neoliberalism and violence: The Big Society and the changing politics of domestic violence in England. Critical Social Policy, 34(3), 333-353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018313515973
Kaletka, C., Makmann, M., & Pelka, B. (2016). Peelling the onion. An exploration of the layers of Social Innovation ecossystems. Modelling a context sensitive perspective on driving and hindering factors for social innovation. European Public Social & Social Innovation Review, 1(2), 83-93. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.16-2.3
Kim, S. (2022). A participatory local governance approach to social innovation: A case study of Seongbuk-gu, South Korea. Environment and Planning Politics and Space, 40(1), 201-220. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544211005784
Klievink, B., & Janssen, M. (2014). Developing multi-layer information infrastructures: Advancing social innovation through public-private governance. Information Systems Management, 31(3), 240-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2014.923268
Klinke, A. (2016). Democratic theory. In C. Ansell, & J. Torfing (Eds.), Handbook on Theories of Governance (pp. 86-101). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2007). Sociologie de l´Action Publique. Armand Colin.
Latour, B. (2012). Reagregando o social: Uma introdução à Teoria do Ator-Rede. Edufba.
Levi-Faur, D. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford University Press.
Levitsky, E., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. Broadway Books.
Magalhães, T., Andion, C., & Alperstedt, G. D. (2020). Laboratórios vivos de inovação social e ação pública: Um enfoque analítico e um caminho metodológico baseados no pragmatismo. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 18(Spe), 680-696. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120190159
Magalhães, T., Andion, C., & Manoel, A. A. (2022). Collaborative research, public inquiry, and democratic experimentalism: Contributions and how to apply pragmatism to social innovation studies. Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 13(1), 71-91. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjnser543
Magalhães, T. G. (2021). Garantir direitos não é brincadeira! Investigação, experimentação e inovação social na política pública de proteção integral de crianças e adolescentes em Florianópolis [Doctoral dissertation, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina]. https://sistemabu.udesc.br/pergamumweb/vinculos/000087/0000876c.pdf
Manoel, A. A. (2021). Semeadura da Agricultura Urbana em Florianópolis: arenas públicas, experimentações e desafios da governança para sustentabilidade [Master’s thesis]. Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Martinez, J. M. T., & Rivera, M. D. D. (2018). Territorial governance and Social Innovation: The cases of San Pedro Capula’s artisanal cheese and rice (Orysa Sativa) of Morelos, Mexico. Agriculture – BASEL, 8(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture8020023
Massey, A., & Johnston-Miller, K. (2016). Governance: Public governance to social innovation? Policy and Politics, 44(4), 663-675. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557314X14042230109592
Mendonça, C. M. (2019). (Re)pensando a participação e o seu papel na democracia à luz do pragmatismo: Um estudo junto ao Fórum de Políticas Públicas de Florianópolis [Master’s thesis, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina]. https://sistemabu.udesc.br/pergamumweb/vinculos/00007b/00007bff.pdf
Meyer, C. (2022). Social Innovation governance in smart specialisation policies and strategies heading towards sustainability: A pathway to RIS4? Social Sciences, 11(4), 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11040150
Miraftab, F. (2004) "Invited and Invented Spaces of Participation: Neoliberal Citizenship and Feminists' Expanded Notion of Politics.," Wagadu: A Journal of Transnational Women's & Gender Studies 1(1), Article 3
Moraes, R. L., & Andion, C. (2018). Civil Society and Social Innovation in public arenas in Brazil: Trajectory and experience of the Movement Against Electoral Corruption (MCCE). Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29, 801-818.
Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Gonzalez, S., & Swyngedouw, E. (2007). Introduction: Social innovation and governance in European cities: Urban development between path dependency and radical innovation. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(3), 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776407077737 .
Observatório de Inovação Social de Florianópolis. (2022). Dados consolidados do Observatório expressos em gráficos. https://observafloripa.com.br/#toppage
Osborne, S. (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge.
Pereira, A. J., & Nichiata, L. Y. I. (2011). A sociedade civil contra a Aids: Demandas coletivas e políticas públicas. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 16(7), 3249-3257. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011000800024
Radnor, Z., Osborne, S., & Glennon. (2016). Public management theory. In C. Ansell, & J. Torfing, Handbook on Theories of Governance (pp. 46-60). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Rana S., Kiminami, L., & Furuzawa, S. (2021). Social Innovation for women’s empowerment in disaster risk governance: Focusing on Common Interest Groups in the Haor Region of Bangladesh. Studies in Regional Science, 51(1), 145-155. https://doi.org/10.2457/srs.51.145
Revel, J. (Org.). (1998). Jogos de escalas: A experiência da microanálise. Editora Fundação Getúlio Vargas.
Sabato, S., & Verschraegen, G. (2019). The multi-level governance of social innovation: How the EU supports socially innovative initiatives. Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, 14(1), 35-66. https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1483/92869
Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2012). Experimentalist governance. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Governance (pp. 169-184). Oxford University Press.
Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in Public Service: Government–Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Sauer, P. C., & Hiete, M. (2020). Multi-stakeholder initiatives as social innovation for governance and practice: A review of responsible mining initiatives. Sustainability 12(1), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010236
Schiavo, E., Santos-Nogueira, C., & Vera, P. (2013). Entre la divulgación de la cultura digital y el surgimiento de los laboratorios ciudadanos. El caso argentino en el contexto latinoamericano. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, 8(23), 179-199. http://www.revistacts.net/numero/23/
Shields, P. (2003). The community of inquiry: Classical pragmatism and public administration. Administration & Society, 35(5), 510-538. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399703256160
Silva, J. L. da. (2021). Atuação das organizações da sociedade civil na garantia dos direitos da criança e do adolescente em Florianópolis, [Master’s thesis, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina]. https://sistemabu.udesc.br/pergamumweb/vinculos/000085/000085f2.pdf
Sorge S., Mann, C., Schleyer, C., Loft, L., Spacek, M., Hernández-Morcillo, M., & Kluvankova, T. (2022). Understanding dynamics of forest ecosystem services governance: A socio-ecological-technical-analytical framework. Ecosystem Services, 55, 101427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101427
Temmerman, L., Veeckman, C., & Ballon, P. (2021). Collaborative governance platform for social innovation in Brussels. Social Enterprise Journal, 17(2), 165-182. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-12-2019-0101
Tenório, F. G., & Teixeira, M. A. C. (2021). O conceito de gestão social e a democracia regressiva no Brasil após 2016. Administração Pública e Gestão Social, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.21118/apgs.v13i2.10767
Terzi, C. (2015, June 22-24). La composante narrative du monde pratique. Intervention au Congrès de l’AFSP, Aix-en-Provence, France.
Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914
Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sorensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance: Advancing the paradigm. Oxford University Press.
Unceta, A., Castro-Spila, J., & García Fronti, J. (2017). The three governances in social innovation. Innovation, 30(4), 406-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2017.1279537
World Bank. (2007). A decade for measuring the quality of governance. World Bank.http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/pdf/booklet_decade_of_measuring_governance.pdf
Zittoun, P. (2021). A abordagem pragmática de políticas públicas. In O. Porto de Oliveira, & P. Hassenteufel, Sociologia política da ação pública (pp. 114-134). ENAP.
Zittoun, P., Fischer, F., & Zahariadis, N. (2021). The political formulation of policy solutions: Arguments, arenas, and coalitions. Policy Press.
Andion, C., Moraes, R. L., & Gonsalves, A. K. R. (2017). Civil society organizations and social innovation: How and to what extent are they influencing social and political change? CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, (90), 5-34. https://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.90.8808
Andion, C., Alperstedt, G. D., & Graeff, J. F. (2019). Social innovation ecosystems and cities: Co-construction of a collaborative platform. In J. Howaldt, C. Kaletka, A. Schröeder, & M. Zirngiebl (Eds.), Atlas of Social Innovation (2nd volume: A world of new practices). European School of Social Innovation.
Andion, C., Alperstedt, G. D., & Graeff, J. F. (2020). Social innovation ecosystems, sustainability, and democratic experimentation: A study in Florianopolis, Brazil. Revista de Administração Pública, 54(1), 181-200. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220180418x
Andion, C., Alperstedt, G., Graeff, J., & Ronconi, L. (2022). Social innovation ecosystems and sustainability in cities: A study in Florianópolis, Brazil. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 1259-1281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01496-9
Anglada S. E. (2016). Social innovation and local systems of governance: A comparison of political participation by networks for the promotion of a solidarity-based economy in Barcelona and Bilbao. Papers, 101(1), 31-49. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.1796
Ansell, C. (2011). Pragmatist democracy: Evolutionary learning as public philosophy. Oxford Scholarship.
Ansell, C. (2012). What is democratic experiment? Contemporary Pragmatism, 9(2), 159-180. https://doi.org/10.1163/18758185-90000235
Ansell, C., & Boin, A. (2019). Taming deep uncertainty: The potential of pragmatist principles for understanding and improving strategic crisis management. Administration & Society, 51(7), 1079-1112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399717747655
Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems. Public Management Review, 23(7), 949-960. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1820272
Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2016). Handbook on theories of governance. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Arampatzi, A. (2022). Social Innovation and austerity governance in Athens and Madrid: Rethinking the changing contours of policy and practice. European Urban and Regional Studies, 29(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764211028900
Arko-Cobbah, A. (2008). The right of access to information: Opportunities and challenges for civil society and good governance in South Africa. IFLA Journal, 34(2), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035208092154
Baker, S., & Mehmood, A. (2015). Social innovation and governance of sustainable places. Local Environment, 20(3), 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.842964
Barandiaran, X. (2021). Gobernanza Colaborativa para la innovación pública y social: El caso de Gipuzkoa, País Vasco. European Public and Social Innovation Review, 6(2), 78-96. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.21-2.6
Bartels, K. (2020). Transforming the relational dynamics of urban governance: How social innovation research can create a trajectory for learning and change. Urban Studies, 57(14), 2868-2884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019889290
Bevilacqua, C., Ou, Y., Pizzimenti, P., & Minervino, G. (2020). New Public institutional forms and social innovation in urban governance: Insights from the “Mayor’s Office of New Urban Mechanics” (MONUM) in Boston. Sustainability, 12(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010023
Bifulco, L. (2020). Sharing and control: The Janus-faced governance of social services at times of social innovation and social investment. Social Work and Society, 18(1), 1-11. https://ejournals.bib.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/sws/article/view/635
Biljohn, M. I. M., & Lues, L. (2020). Citizen participation, social innovation, and the governance of local government service delivery: Findings from South Africa. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(3), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1628052
Bode, I., & Brandsen, T. (2014). State-Third Sector partnerships: A short overview of key issues in the debate. Public Management Review, 16(8), 1055-1066. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.957344
Bragaglia, F. (2021). Social Innovation as a ‘magic concept’ for policy makers and its implications for urban governance. Planning Theory, 20(2), 102-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095220934832
Burlandy, L. (2011). A atuação da sociedade civil na construção do campo da Alimentação e Nutrição no Brasil: Elementos para reflexão. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 6(1), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011000100010
Calvo, P. M. H., & Fernandez, J. G. (2021). Iniciativas de diálogo, participación e innovación social para mejorar la gobernanza territorial en el medio rural. Ciudades, (24), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.24197/ciudades.24.2021.45-64
Campomori, F., & Casula, M. (2022). How to frame the governance dimension of social Innovation: Theorectical considerations and empirical evidence. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2022.2036952
Castells, M. (2018). Ruptura: A crise da democracia liberal. Zahar.
Castro-Arce, K., Parra, C., & Vanclay, F. (2019). Social Innovation, sustainability and the governance of protected areas: Revealing theory as it plays out in practice in Costa Rica. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(13), 2255-2272. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1537976
Cefaï, D. (2002). Qu’est-ce qu’une arène publique? Quelques pistes pour une approche pragmatiste. In D. Cefaï, & I. Joseph (Orgs.), L’héritage du pragmatism: Conflits d’urbanité et épreuves de civisme (pp. 51-82). Éditions de l'Aube.
Cefaï, D. (2007). Pourquoi se mobilise-t-on? Les théories de l’action collective. La Découverte.
Cefaï, D. (2017). Públicos, problemas públicos, arenas públicas... O que nos ensina o pragmatismo (Parte 1). Novos Estudos CEBRAP, 36(1), 187-213. https://doi.org/10.25091/S0101-3300201700010009
Cefaï, D., & Terzi, C. (2012). L´expérience des problèmes publiques. Éditions de l’EHESS.
Certomà, C. (2022). Future scenarios of digital social innovation in urban governance. A collective discussion on the socio-political implications in Ghent. Cities, 122. 103542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103542
Chateauraynaud, F. (2011). Argumenter dans un champ de forces: Essai de balistique sociologique. Éditions Petra.
Chateauraynaud, F., & Debaz, J. (2017). Aux Bords de l’irreversible: Sociologie pragmatique des transformations. Éditions Petra.
Chateauraynaud, F. (2021). Des expérimentations démocratiques en tension. L’oeuvre des citoyens dans le travail politique des bifurcations. Cahiers du GRM, 18. https://doi.org/10.4000/grm.3238
Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1992). Civil Society and Political Theory. MIT Press.
Constantini, E., Piriu, A. A., & Addabbo, T. (2022). Understanding the nexus between local governance and social innovation: Evidence from an Italian study on family policies, with an ex-post COVID-19 interference. Polis, 37(1), 71-104. https://rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1424/103559
Corrêa, D. (2019). A sociologia pragmática em três gestos. In R. Cantu, S. Leal, D. S. Corrêa, & L. Chartain., Sociologia, crítica e pragmatismo: Diálogos entre França e Brasil (pp. 265-302). Pontes Editores.
De Muro, P., Hamdouch, A., Cameron, S., & Moulaert, F. et al. (2007). Organisations de la société civile, innovation sociale et gouvernance de la lutte contre la pauvreté dans le Tiers-Monde. Mondes en Développement, 3(139), 25–42
Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. Swallow Press.
Dewey, J. (1950). Logica, teoria de la investigación. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Dewey, J. (1974). Experiência e natureza (Murilo Otávio Rodrigues Paes Leme, Trans.). Abril Cultural.
Dias, M. E. (2019). Arena Pública de Resíduos Sólidos Urbanos: Um estudo no Ecossistema de Inovação Social de Florianópolis [Master’s thesis]. Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Eizaguirre, S., Pradel, M., Terrones, A., Martinez-Celorrio, X., & García, M. (2012). Multilevel governance and social cohesion: Bringing back conflict in citizenship practices. Urban Studies, 49(9), 1999-2016. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26150973
Follet, M. P. (2013). Creative Experience. Martino Fine Books. (Original work published 1951).
Frega, R. (2019). Pragmatism and the wide view of democracy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Galego, D., Moulaert, F., Brans, M., & Santinha, G. (2022). Social innovation & governance: A scoping review. The European Journal of Social Science Research, 35(2), 265-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2021.1879630
Follet, M. P. (2016). The New State. Connecticut. Martino Fine Books. (Original work published 1923).
Gaudin, J.-P. (2002). Pourquoi la gouvernance. Presses de Sciences Po.
Georgios, C., & Barraí, H. (2023). Social Innovation in rural governance: A comparative case study across the marginalised rural EU. Journal of Rural Studies, 99, 193-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.06.004
Gerometta, J., Hausermann, H. H., & Longo, G. (2005). Social Innovation and civil society in urban governance: Strategies for an inclusive city. Urban Studies, 42(11), 2007-2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279851
Gonsalves, A. K. R., & Andion, C. (2019). Ação pública e inovação social: Uma análise do Sistema de Garantia de Direitos da Criança e do Adolescente de Florianópolis-SC. Organizações e Sociedade, 26(89), 221-248. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-9260892
Gurza Lavalle, A., & Szwako, J. (2015). Sociedade civil, Estado e autonomia: Argumentos, contra-argumentos e avanços no debate. Opinião Pública, 21(1), 157-187. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-0191211157
Howaldt, J., Kaletka, C., Schröder, A., & Zirngiebl, M. (2018). Atlas of Social Innovation – New practices for a better future. TU Dortmund University.
Howaldt, J., Kaletka, C., Schröder, A., & Zirngiebl, M. (Eds.). (2019). Atlas of Social Innovation – A world of new practices (2nd vol). European School of Social Innovation.
Ishkanian, A. (2014). Neoliberalism and violence: The Big Society and the changing politics of domestic violence in England. Critical Social Policy, 34(3), 333-353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018313515973
Kaletka, C., Makmann, M., & Pelka, B. (2016). Peelling the onion. An exploration of the layers of Social Innovation ecossystems. Modelling a context sensitive perspective on driving and hindering factors for social innovation. European Public Social & Social Innovation Review, 1(2), 83-93. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.16-2.3
Kim, S. (2022). A participatory local governance approach to social innovation: A case study of Seongbuk-gu, South Korea. Environment and Planning Politics and Space, 40(1), 201-220. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544211005784
Klievink, B., & Janssen, M. (2014). Developing multi-layer information infrastructures: Advancing social innovation through public-private governance. Information Systems Management, 31(3), 240-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2014.923268
Klinke, A. (2016). Democratic theory. In C. Ansell, & J. Torfing (Eds.), Handbook on Theories of Governance (pp. 86-101). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2007). Sociologie de l´Action Publique. Armand Colin.
Latour, B. (2012). Reagregando o social: Uma introdução à Teoria do Ator-Rede. Edufba.
Levi-Faur, D. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford University Press.
Levitsky, E., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. Broadway Books.
Magalhães, T., Andion, C., & Alperstedt, G. D. (2020). Laboratórios vivos de inovação social e ação pública: Um enfoque analítico e um caminho metodológico baseados no pragmatismo. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 18(Spe), 680-696. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120190159
Magalhães, T., Andion, C., & Manoel, A. A. (2022). Collaborative research, public inquiry, and democratic experimentalism: Contributions and how to apply pragmatism to social innovation studies. Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 13(1), 71-91. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjnser543
Magalhães, T. G. (2021). Garantir direitos não é brincadeira! Investigação, experimentação e inovação social na política pública de proteção integral de crianças e adolescentes em Florianópolis [Doctoral dissertation, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina]. https://sistemabu.udesc.br/pergamumweb/vinculos/000087/0000876c.pdf
Manoel, A. A. (2021). Semeadura da Agricultura Urbana em Florianópolis: arenas públicas, experimentações e desafios da governança para sustentabilidade [Master’s thesis]. Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Martinez, J. M. T., & Rivera, M. D. D. (2018). Territorial governance and Social Innovation: The cases of San Pedro Capula’s artisanal cheese and rice (Orysa Sativa) of Morelos, Mexico. Agriculture – BASEL, 8(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture8020023
Massey, A., & Johnston-Miller, K. (2016). Governance: Public governance to social innovation? Policy and Politics, 44(4), 663-675. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557314X14042230109592
Mendonça, C. M. (2019). (Re)pensando a participação e o seu papel na democracia à luz do pragmatismo: Um estudo junto ao Fórum de Políticas Públicas de Florianópolis [Master’s thesis, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina]. https://sistemabu.udesc.br/pergamumweb/vinculos/00007b/00007bff.pdf
Meyer, C. (2022). Social Innovation governance in smart specialisation policies and strategies heading towards sustainability: A pathway to RIS4? Social Sciences, 11(4), 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11040150
Miraftab, F. (2004) "Invited and Invented Spaces of Participation: Neoliberal Citizenship and Feminists' Expanded Notion of Politics.," Wagadu: A Journal of Transnational Women's & Gender Studies 1(1), Article 3
Moraes, R. L., & Andion, C. (2018). Civil Society and Social Innovation in public arenas in Brazil: Trajectory and experience of the Movement Against Electoral Corruption (MCCE). Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29, 801-818.
Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Gonzalez, S., & Swyngedouw, E. (2007). Introduction: Social innovation and governance in European cities: Urban development between path dependency and radical innovation. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(3), 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776407077737 .
Observatório de Inovação Social de Florianópolis. (2022). Dados consolidados do Observatório expressos em gráficos. https://observafloripa.com.br/#toppage
Osborne, S. (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge.
Pereira, A. J., & Nichiata, L. Y. I. (2011). A sociedade civil contra a Aids: Demandas coletivas e políticas públicas. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 16(7), 3249-3257. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011000800024
Radnor, Z., Osborne, S., & Glennon. (2016). Public management theory. In C. Ansell, & J. Torfing, Handbook on Theories of Governance (pp. 46-60). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Rana S., Kiminami, L., & Furuzawa, S. (2021). Social Innovation for women’s empowerment in disaster risk governance: Focusing on Common Interest Groups in the Haor Region of Bangladesh. Studies in Regional Science, 51(1), 145-155. https://doi.org/10.2457/srs.51.145
Revel, J. (Org.). (1998). Jogos de escalas: A experiência da microanálise. Editora Fundação Getúlio Vargas.
Sabato, S., & Verschraegen, G. (2019). The multi-level governance of social innovation: How the EU supports socially innovative initiatives. Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, 14(1), 35-66. https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1483/92869
Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2012). Experimentalist governance. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Governance (pp. 169-184). Oxford University Press.
Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in Public Service: Government–Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Sauer, P. C., & Hiete, M. (2020). Multi-stakeholder initiatives as social innovation for governance and practice: A review of responsible mining initiatives. Sustainability 12(1), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010236
Schiavo, E., Santos-Nogueira, C., & Vera, P. (2013). Entre la divulgación de la cultura digital y el surgimiento de los laboratorios ciudadanos. El caso argentino en el contexto latinoamericano. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, 8(23), 179-199. http://www.revistacts.net/numero/23/
Shields, P. (2003). The community of inquiry: Classical pragmatism and public administration. Administration & Society, 35(5), 510-538. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399703256160
Silva, J. L. da. (2021). Atuação das organizações da sociedade civil na garantia dos direitos da criança e do adolescente em Florianópolis, [Master’s thesis, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina]. https://sistemabu.udesc.br/pergamumweb/vinculos/000085/000085f2.pdf
Sorge S., Mann, C., Schleyer, C., Loft, L., Spacek, M., Hernández-Morcillo, M., & Kluvankova, T. (2022). Understanding dynamics of forest ecosystem services governance: A socio-ecological-technical-analytical framework. Ecosystem Services, 55, 101427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101427
Temmerman, L., Veeckman, C., & Ballon, P. (2021). Collaborative governance platform for social innovation in Brussels. Social Enterprise Journal, 17(2), 165-182. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-12-2019-0101
Tenório, F. G., & Teixeira, M. A. C. (2021). O conceito de gestão social e a democracia regressiva no Brasil após 2016. Administração Pública e Gestão Social, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.21118/apgs.v13i2.10767
Terzi, C. (2015, June 22-24). La composante narrative du monde pratique. Intervention au Congrès de l’AFSP, Aix-en-Provence, France.
Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914
Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sorensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance: Advancing the paradigm. Oxford University Press.
Unceta, A., Castro-Spila, J., & García Fronti, J. (2017). The three governances in social innovation. Innovation, 30(4), 406-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2017.1279537
World Bank. (2007). A decade for measuring the quality of governance. World Bank.http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/pdf/booklet_decade_of_measuring_governance.pdf
Zittoun, P. (2021). A abordagem pragmática de políticas públicas. In O. Porto de Oliveira, & P. Hassenteufel, Sociologia política da ação pública (pp. 114-134). ENAP.
Zittoun, P., Fischer, F., & Zahariadis, N. (2021). The political formulation of policy solutions: Arguments, arenas, and coalitions. Policy Press.