The interdependence between ease of doing business, innovation, and competitiveness of nations

Main Article Content

Rogério Scabim Morano
Rafael Ricardo Jacomossi
Alcides Barrichello
Paulo Roberto Feldmann

Abstract

This study aims to assess whether the ease of doing business can be considered as an alternative path (indirect path) between innovation and competitiveness of nations, improving the understanding of the effect transfer between these two variables. The study used exploratory/confirmatory factor analysis and mediation techniques applied to data from 141 countries contemplated in The Global Competitiveness report 2019 by the WEF and Doing Business report 2019 by the World Bank. The results show the mediator role of ease of doing business in the relationship between innovation and global competitiveness. Innovation improves the competitiveness of nations, but rules and regulations can be a barrier to this relationship. Therefore, ease of doing business is an essential element in improving the relationship between innovation and competitiveness, helping policymakers to focus their efforts on ease of doing business aspects
in such a way as to enhance the economic process and support investors to make the most appropriate decisions when choosing the countries in which to invest their resources. Complementarily, the study also contributes by pointing out that the current method of calculating the EDB index may not be the most suitable, since it can distort analysis affecting international investment feasibility studies

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Morano, R. S., Jacomossi, R. R., Barrichello, A., & Feldmann, P. R. (2023). The interdependence between ease of doing business, innovation, and competitiveness of nations. Brazilian Administration Review, 20(2), e220103. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2023220103
Section
Research Articles

References

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity and poverty. Profile Books
Alderete, M. V. (2020). Towards measuring the economic impact of open data by innovating and doing business. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 17(3), 2050022. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877020500224
Amankwah-Amoah, J., Egbetokun, A., & Osabutey, E. L. C. (2018). Meeting the 21st century challenges of doing business in Africa. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 131(February), 336-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.006
Anderson, D. R., Sweeney, D. J., & Williams, T. A. (2013). Estatística aplicada a Administração e Economia (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning.
Armstrong, C. E., & Lengnick‐Hall, C. A. (2013). The Pandora’s box of social integration mechanisms: Can they make it more difficult to realize absorptive capacity?. Journal of Strategy and Management, 6(1), 4-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554251311296530
Bae, C. (2016). R&D spillovers with endogenous absorptive capacity: Lessons for developing countries. East Asian Economic Review (EAER), 20(2), 191-228. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2804910
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
Barrichello, A., Santos, E. G. dos, & Morano, R. S. (2020). Determinant and priority factors of innovation for the development of nations. Innovation and Management Review, 17(3), 307-320. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-04-2019-0040
Bertrand, O., & Mol, M. J. (2013). The antecedents and innovation effects of domestic and offshore R&D outsourcing: The contingent impact of cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Strategic Management Journal, 34(6), 751-760. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2034
Blomström, M. (1986). Foreign investment and productive efficiency: The case of Mexico. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(1), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.2307/2098609
Blomström, M., & Kokko, A. (1998). Multinational corporations and spillovers. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12(3), 247-277. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00056
Brettel, M., Greve, G. I., & Flatten, T. C. (2011). Giving up linearity: Absorptive capacity and performance. Journal of Managerial Issues, 23(2), 164-189. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23209224
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2. Ed.). Routledge.
Canare, T., Francisco, J. P., & Morales, J. F. (2019). Long- and short-run relationship between firm creation and the ease and cost of doing business. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 26(2), 249-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2018.1558636
Chwif, L., & Medina, A. (2014). Modelagem e simulação de eventos discretos: Teoria e aplicações (4th ed.). Elsevier Brasil.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive-capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
Corcoran, A., & Gillanders, R. (2015). Foreign direct investment and the ease of doing business. Review of World Economics, 151, 103-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-014-0194-5
Crafts, N. (2006). Regulation and productivity performance. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(2), 186-202. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXREP/GRJ012
Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154-1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x
Dougherty, S. (2007, December). China and India making sense of innovation and growth: Innovation has played a modest role in explaining growth in both China and India in recent years, but both countries have work to do to sustain their promising growth paths. Moreover, there are important differences between the respective challenges that each country faces. OECD Observer, (nº 264-265), pp. 60+. Gale Academic OneFile link.gale.com/apps/doc/A178083628/AONE?u=googlescholar&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=80f90347
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2016). The Global Innovation Index 2016. World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4064
Estevão, J., Lopes, J. D., & Penela, D. (2020). The doing business ranking and the design of public policies: The effect of regional dynamics. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34(1), 2469-2483. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1831942
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149-1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Feldmann, P. R., Jacomossi, R. R., Barrichello, A., & Morano, R. S. (2019). The relationship between innovation and global competitiveness: The mediating role of management practices evaluated by Structural Equation Modeling. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 21(2), 195-212. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v21i2.3970
Fleury, M. T. L., Mauro, M. de, Oliveira, L., Mauerberg, A., & Fleury, A. (2018). Management practices and competitiveness: A multisector study in the Brazilian industry. Brazilian Administration Review, 15(4), e180028. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2018180028
Ford, A. (2010). Modelling the environment (2nd ed.). Island Press.
Global Impact Investing Network. (2015, July). The landscape for impact investing in West Africa. GIIN.
Gordon, R. J. (2016). The rise and fall of American growth: The U.S. standard of living since the Civil War. Princeton University Press.
Govender, L. (2015) Integrated National Export Strategy (INES) or “Export 2030”. Pretoria: Department of Trade and Industry, (p. 20). http://www.thedtic.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/INES.pdf
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise Multivariada de Dados (6th ed.). Bookman Editora.
Haliti, B., Merovci, S., Sherpa, S., & Hetemi, A. (2020). The impact of the ease doing business indicators on foreign direct investment in the European transition economies. Ekonomika, 98(2), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.15388/ekon.2019.2.2
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
Herrendorf, B., & Teixeira, A. (2011). Barriers to entry and development. International Economic Review, 52(2), 573-602. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-2354.2011.00639.X
Hofacker, C. F., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2020). The marketing of information in the information age. Marketing Management Journal, 30(1), 1-16. https://www.mmaglobal.org/_files/ugd/3968ca_c5ce7b0b8ef5451b81edb0ddad8a5ae7.pdf
Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (2007). Knowledge creation and Management: New challenges for managers. Oxford University Press.
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. (2019). Doing Business 2019: Training for reform (Vol. 2). The World Bank Publication. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/975621541012231575/Doing-Business-2019-Training-for-Reform
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. (2020). Doing Business 2020 Comparing Business Regulation in 190 Economies. The World Bank Publication. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/688761571934946384/Doing-Business-2020-Comparing-Business-Regulation-in-190-Economies
Jacomossi, R. R., & Feldmann, P. R. (2020). Boas práticas de gestão e capacidade absortiva: Impactos na produtividade das firmas. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 24(5), 432-447. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849RAC2020190140
Jacomossi, R. R., Feldmann, P. R., Barrichello, A., & Morano, R. S. (2021). Does ecological sustainability really matter? Evaluation of its mediating role in the relationship between innovation and competitiveness. Brazilian Administration Review, 18(3), e200126. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692BAR2021200126
Jerbashian, V., & Kochanova, A. (2016). The impact of doing business regulations on investments in ICT. Empirical Economics, 50, 991-1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-015-0953-8
Khan, S. A. (2020). The effect of governance on international trade and the mediating role of business regulations. Society & Sustainability, 2(3), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.38157/society_sustainability.v2i3.198
Klapper, L. F., & Love, I. (2010). The impact of business environment reforms on new firm registration [Working Paper nº 5493]. World Bank Research.
Kofarbai, H. Z., & Bambale, A. J. (2016). Investment climate and foreign direct investment in Nigeria: The mediating role of ease of doing business. Journal of Energy and Economic Development, 2(2), 10-39. https://www.proquest.com/openview/c7705b005e1af4a4518294362f5addf1/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2042854
Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., & Sanchís-Pedregosa, C. (2019). Could the ease of doing business be considered a predictor of countries’ socio-economic wealth? An empirical analysis using PLS-SEM. Journal of International Studies, 12(4), 229-243. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2019/12-4/15
Liu, Z. (2008). Foreign direct investment and technology spillovers: Theory and evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 85(1-2), 176-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.07.001
López-Gonzalez, J., & Ferencz, J. (2018). Digital Trade and Market Openness (OECD Trade Policy Papers nº 217). OECD Trade Policy Papers, Paris, France. https://doi.org/10.1787/1bd89c9a-en
López González, J., & Jouanjean, M.-A. (2017). Digital Trade: Developing a framework for analysis (OECD Trade Policy Papers nº 205). OECD Trade Policy Papers, Paris, France. https://doi.org/10.1787/524c8c83-en
Marôco, J. (2014). Análise de equações estruturais: Fundamentos teóricos, software e aplicações (2nd ed.). [Report Number], Pêro Pinheiro.
Melo, T. M., Correa, A. L., Carvalho, E. G., & Possas, M. L. (2017). Competitividade e gap tecnológico: Uma análise comparativa entre Brasil e países europeus selecionados. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 16(1), 129-156. https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v16i1.8649142
Morano, R. S., Feldmann, P. R., Jacomossi, R. R., & Barrichello, A. (in press). FDI and technology transfer: the mediating role of market factors. European Journal of International Management. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2021.10036103
Mudaliar, A., Bass, R., Dithrich, H., & Nova, N. (2019). GIIN 2019 Annual Impact Investor Survey. New York, NY. https://thegiin.org/research/publication/impinv-survey-2019/
Najafi-Tavani, S., Sharifi, H., & Ismail, H. S. (2014). A study of contingency relationships between supplier involvement, absorptive capacity and agile product innovation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(1), 65-92. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-09-2011-0331
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Osuna-Alarcón, M. R., & Rodríguez-Hernández, P. (2020). Investigación, desarrollo e innovación en el sector empresarial español: Dificultades para su implementación. Profesional de La Información, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.3145/EPI.2020.ENE.19
Panayides, P. (2006). Enhancing innovation capability through relationship management and implications for performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(4), 466-483. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060610707876
Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13(6), 343-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
Pieters, R. (2017). Meaningful mediation analysis: Plausible causal inference and informative communication. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 692-716. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx081
Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press.
Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 93-115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022658
Rensburg, L. J. van. (2021). The factors influencing ease of doing business with digital trade in countries with strict exchange controls. In M. Kolaković, T. Horvatinović, & I. Turčić (Eds.), The 6th Business & Entrepreneurial Economics (pp. 102-108). Student Business Incubator at the University of Zagreb.
Ritala, P., & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. (2013). Incremental and radical innovation in coopetition: The role of absorptive capacity and appropriability. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(1), 154-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00956.x
Rogge, N., & Archer, G. (2021). Measuring and analyzing country change in establishing ease of doing business using a revised version of World Bank’s ease of doing business index. European Journal of Operational Research, 290(1), 373-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.07.065
Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge University Press.
Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in Social Psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(6), 359-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x
Santos, E. G. D., Barrichello, A., & Morano, R. S. (2023). How important are institutions for innovation and global competitiveness? International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 30(4), 476-496. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2023.130075
Schreiber, D., Ermel, U. T., Figueiredo, J. A. S., & Zeni, A. (2016). Analysis of innovation and its environmental impacts on the chemical industry. Brazilian Administration Review, 13(1), 56-75. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2016150120
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Harvard University Press.
Schwab, K. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report 2019. World Economic Forum. World Economic, Forum, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-competitiveness-report-2019
Shuaib, K. M. (2020). The changing pattern of international trade: Import substitution policy and digital economy in Nigeria. A Review. International Journal of Economics and Business Management, 6(4), 13-25. https://www.iiardjournals.org/get/IJEBM/VOL.%206%20NO.%204%202020/The%20Changing%20Pattern%20of%20International.pdf
Smirnov, E. N., & Karelina, E. A. (2020). Regulation of international trade in the digital economy: A new regulatory paradigm. Trade Policy, 4(24), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.17323/2499-9415-2020-4-24-27-36
Spezamiglio, B. dos S., Galina, S. V. R., & Calia, R. C. (2016). Competitiveness, innovation and sustainability: An inter-relation through literature sistematization. REAd. Revista Eletrônica de Administração, 22(2), 363-393. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-2311.009162016.62887
Suyanto, H. B., & Salim, R. A. (2012). Foreign direct investment spillovers and productivity growth in Indonesian garment and electronics manufacturing. The Journal of Development Studies, 48(10), 1397-1411. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2011.646992
Suyanto, H. B., & Salim, R. A. (2013). Foreign direct investment spillovers and technical efficiency in the Indonesian pharmaceutical sector: Firm level evidence. Applied Economics, 45(3), 383-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.605554
The World Bank. (2021). World Bank Group to discontinue doing business report. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/statement/2021/09/16/world-bank-group-to-discontinue-doing-business-report
Tognazzo, A., & Mazzurana, P. A. M. (2017). Friends doing business: An explorative longitudinal case study of creativity and innovation in an Italian technology- Based Start-Up. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 13(2), 77-104. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3105534
Woodworth, R. S. (1926). Dynamic Psychology. The Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology, 33(1), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856559.1926.10532344
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive Capacity: A Review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 165-203. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134351