Who Trains Researchers, and How do They Learn to Conduct Research?

Main Article Content

Gracyanne Freire de Araujo
Beatriz Quiroz Villardi

Abstract

We invite the academic community in administration and accounting to reflect on the training of researchers. This article addresses two guiding questions: Who trains researchers, and how do they learn to conduct research? We argue that the faculty’s research and teaching capacities are complementary, but that research production is prioritized at the expense of training new researchers. Thus, it is important to prepare faculty to train researchers for both academic and industry settings. Accordingly, this “Thinking Outside the Box” (TOB) article examines researcher training from two dimensions: the practice of scientific research and faculty development focused on researcher training. We do not claim that these dimensions represent the only possible approaches; rather, we seek to advance the debate between instruction-oriented and research-oriented teaching. In addition, we propose an agenda for future studies and contributions to institutional practices within graduate programs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Araujo, G. F. de, & Villardi, B. Q. (2026). Who Trains Researchers, and How do They Learn to Conduct Research?. Brazilian Administration Review, 22(4), e250233. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2025250233
Section
Thinking Outside the Box

References

Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2024). The art of phenomena construction: A framework for coming up with research phenomena beyond ‘the usual suspects’. Journal of Management Studies, 61(5), 1737-1765. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13123

Balkin, D. B., & Mello, J. A. (2012). Facilitating and creating synergies between teaching and research: The role of the academic administrator. Journal of Management Education, 36(4), 471-494. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562911420372

Barbosa da Silva, A., Barbosa da Silva, R., Marback Neto, G., & Rossetto, C. R. (2025). Metodologias ativas na educação superior: Análise do uso e domínio na prática de docentes de cursos de administração. Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, 26(1), e2563. https://doi.org/10.13058/raep.2025.v26n1.2563

Bispo, M. S. (2020). Contradições da pós-graduação em administração brasileira. Revista Eletrônica de Ciência Administrativa, 19(2), 169-180. https://doi.org/10.21529/RECADM.2020007

Bispo, M. S. (2022). Refletindo sobre administração contemporânea. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 26(1), e210203. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2022210203.en

Bispo, M. S. (2024). Implicações da colonização acadêmica nos periódicos científicos brasileiros em administração. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 28(1), e240049. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2024240049.en

Bispo, M., Correia Lima, M., & Demo, P. (2025). Editorial - Desafios da Docência em Cursos de Graduação em Administração. Administração: Ensino E Pesquisa, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.13058/raep.2024.v25n3.2683

Bispo, M. S. & Davel, E. P. B. (2021). Impacto Educacional na Pesquisa. Organizações & Sociedade, 28(97), 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-92302021v28n9700EN

Boussebaa, M., Alcadipani, R., Vianna, F., Pina, M. C., & Clegg, S. (2025, in press). Englishization beyond the Global North: Dependency, struggle, and resistance in Brazilian management research. Academy of Management Learning & Education. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2023.0245

Brognoli, P. C., Rodrigues, M. B., & Souza, A. B. N. P. M. (2025). A banalização do trabalho docente: Desafios dos professores no curso de Administração. Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, 25(3), 227-250. https://doi.org/10.13058/raep.2024.v25n3.2571

Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Coghlan, D., & Nzembayie, K. F. (2025). Putting the scholar back into scholarship, the researcher into research, the knower into knowing, the entrepreneur into entrepreneurship: A call to interiority. Management Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076251377545

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. (2025). VII Plano Nacional de Pós-Graduação 2025–2030. Brasília: CAPES. https://www.gov.br/capes/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/conselho-superior-aprova-vii-plano-nacional-de-pos-graduacao

Cunliffe, A. L. (2004). On Becoming a Critically Reflexive Practitioner. Journal of Management Education, 28, 407-426. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562904264440

Cunliffe, A. L., & Pavlovich, K. (2022). Making our work matter: From spectator to engagement through public organization and Management studies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 36(3), 879-895. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2020.0051

Demo, P. (2017). Pesquisa: princípio científico e educativo (14ª. Ed.). Cortez.

Dewey, J. (1963). Experience and Education. Collier Books.

Edwards, D. M., & Meagher, L. R. (2020). A framework to evaluate the impacts of research on policy and practice: A forestry pilot study. Forest Policy and Economics, 114, 101975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101975

Eriksen, M. (2012). Facilitating authentic becoming. Journal of Management Education, 36(5), 698-736. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562911423883

Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. (S. Sampson, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810503

Ford, E. W., Duncan, W. J., Bedeian, A. G., Ginter, P. M., Rousculp, M. D., & Adams, A. M. (2003). Mitigating risks, visible hands, inevitable disasters, and soft variables: Management research that matters to managers. Academy of Management Perspectives, 17, 46-60. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2003.9474811

Kuenzer, A. Z., & Moraes, M. C. M. (2005). Temas e tramas na pós-graduação em educação. Educação & Sociedade, 26(93), 1341-1363. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-73302005000400015

Kumar, A., Soundararajan, V., Bapuji, H., Köhler, T., Alcadipani, R., Morsing, M., & Coraiola, D. M. (2024). Unequal worlds: Management education and inequalities. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 23, 379-386. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2024.0318

Machado, A. M. N., & Bianchetti, L. (2011). (Des)fetichização do produtivismo acadêmico: Desafios para o trabalhador-pesquisador. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 51(3), 244-254. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902011000300005

Magnin, L. S. L. T., Faria, J. H., Penteado, R. C., & Takahashi, A. R. W. (2020). Produtivismo na pós-graduação em Administração: Posicionamentos dos pesquisadores brasileiros, estratégias de produção e desafios enfrentados. REAd. Revista Eletrônica de Administração, 26(2), 265-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-2311.284.95633

Pearce, J. L., & Huang, L. (2012). The decreasing value of our research to management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(2), 247-262. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.0554

Pearce, J., & Pechmann, C. (2025). When does it become overkill and exploitation? Journal of Management Inquiry, 34(4), 378-384. https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926251330825

Pittaway, L. A., Tantawy, M. M., Corbett, A. C., & Brush, C. (2023). Improving doctoral educator development: A scaffolding approach. Journal of Management Education, 47(6), 618-648. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629231197219

Resolução CNE/CES n. 5, de 14 de outubro de 2021. (2021). Institui as Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais do curso de graduação em Administração. Conselho Nacional de Educação. Câmara de Educação Superior. Diário Oficial da União, seção1, p.47. http://pesquisa.in.gov.br/imprensa/jsp/visualiza/index.jsp?data=18/10/2021&jornal=515&pagina=47

Sandes-Guimarães, L. V. D., & Hourneaux, F. (2020). Research impact–what is it, after all? Editorial impact series part 1. RAUSP Management Journal, 55(3), 283-287. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-07-2020-202

Sandberg, J., & Alvesson, M. (2021). Meanings of theory: Clarifying theory through typification. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2), 487-516. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12587

Santos, G. T., & Silva, A. B. (2019). “Diving” into the meanings and revealing conceptions of being a professor in management. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 20(5), eRAMG190144. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eRAMG190144

Severiano, E., Jr., Cunha, D. O., Zouain, D. M., Gonçalves, C. P. (2021). Produtivismo acadêmico e suas consequências para a produção científica na área de Administração. Revista Eletrônica de Administração, 27(2), 343-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-2311.317.103796

Silva, A. B. (2019). Produtivismo acadêmico multinível: Mercadoria Performativa na Pós-graduação em Administração. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 59(5), 341-352. http://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020190504

Thomas, C. (1995). Helping students complete master’s theses through active supervision. Journal of Management Education, 19(2), 240-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256299501900209

Whetten, D. A. (2021). Republication of “Principles of effective course design: What I wish I had known about learning-centered teaching 30 years ago”. Journal of Management Education, 45(6), 834-854. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629211044985

Zeichner, K. M. (1998). Para além da divisão entre professor-pesquisador e pesquisador acadêmico. In C. M. Geraldi, D. Fiorentini, & E. M. Pereira (Orgs.), Cartografia do trabalho docente: Professor(a)-pesquisador(a) (pp. 207–236). Mercado de Letras.

Zeichner, K. (2023). The “Turn Once Again Toward Practice-Based Teacher Education” revisited. Journal of Teacher Education, 74(2), 178-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871231160401

Similar Articles

<< < 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.