Moving Beyond Linear Cause-and-Effect Logics: Reflections on Rigor and Relevance of Qualitative Research in OSCM

Main Article Content

Katja Wölfl
Kenyth Alves de Freitas
Renata Andreoni Barboza

Abstract

Qualitative research has become increasingly important to Operations and Supply Chain Management (OSCM) as scholars confront complex phenomena. In this interview, Assistant Professor Katja Wölfl reflects on the value of qualitative research and explains why these approaches are particularly useful for studying complex, context-dependent phenomena. She discusses how qualitative methods can support early-stage theorizing, process explanations, and configurational perspectives that move beyond linear cause-and-effect logics. Assistant Professor Wölfl provides concrete guidance on conducting and presenting qualitative research, including how to structure the analysis clearly, use tables and interview quotes effectively, strengthen data through triangulation, and make more deliberate choices about sampling and research design. She also explores the opportunities and challenges of qualitative research in emerging economies, emphasizing that context should not be treated merely as a setting but as a driver of theory. The interview concludes with advice for PhD students and early-career researchers aiming to publish qualitative work internationally, highlighting the importance of literature grounding, journal fit, and writing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wölfl, K., Freitas, K. A. de, & Barboza, R. A. (2026). Moving Beyond Linear Cause-and-Effect Logics: Reflections on Rigor and Relevance of Qualitative Research in OSCM. Brazilian Administration Review, 23(4), e260165. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2026260165
Section
Interview

References

Cornelissen, J. P. (2025). The problem with propositions: Theoretical triangulation to better explain phenomena in management research. Academy of Management Review, 50(2), 342-365. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2022.0297

Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational research methods, 16(1), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151

Welch, C., Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E., Piekkari, R., & Plakoyiannaki, E. (2022). Reconciling theory and context: How the case study can set a new agenda for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(1), 4-26. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00484-5

Wilhelm, M., Wölfl, K., Rosca, E., & Scholten, K. (2026). Advancing rigor in operations management qualitative research: From proceduralism to reflexive reasoning. Journal of Operations Management, 72(5), 753-769. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.70051

Woelfl, K., Kaufmann, L., & Carter, C. R. (2023). In the eye of the beholder: A configurational exploration of perceived deceptive supplier behavior in negotiations. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 59(2), 33-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12298

Woelfl, K., Ketchen, D. J., & Kaufmann, L. (2026). A configurational perspective on the quality of managers’ counterfactual reflections. Journal of Management, 52(2), 518-551. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241271244

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.