Navigating the Academic Publication Landscape: Reflections on Peer Review, Editorial Practices, and Research Quality
Main Article Content
Abstract
The academic publication landscape in marketing and management has changed greatly in the past decades. In this interview, Professor Adamantios Diamantopoulos reflects on increased competition in top journals, the rise of open-access outlets, higher methodological standards, and more complex editorial structures. Drawing on his experience as an author, reviewer, associate editor, and editor, he discusses changes in peer review, editorial roles, and the challenges of desk rejections and reviewer competence. The discussion also covers artificial intelligence’s impact on authorship, reviewing, and data generation. The interview offers practical insights for scholars navigating a more competitive, complex publication environment.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496-515. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308374
Lim, W. M. (2026). Theory and theory development: Guidelines for establishing theoretical gaps, foundations, contributions, and implications. Journal of Business Research, 202, 115745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115745
Montanari, M. G., Diamantopoulos, A., & Giraldi, J. D. M. E. (2026). Brand origin and country-of-manufacture origin changes: do losses loom larger than gains?. International Marketing Review, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-01-2025-0033
Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490-495. https://doi.org/10.2307/258554